Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1683-1683, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1683.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Implications of Low Frequency of IS6110 in
Fingerprinting Field Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
from Kerala, India
 |
LETTER |
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of
IS6110 in PvuII-digested genomic DNA has been
advocated for the fingerprinting of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis as an approved standard methodology (8).
This has proven to be very useful in the developed world, including the
tracing of the New York outbreak of multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis (2). The success of the screening hinges
on the extent and type of polymorphism of the isolates.
Kerala, a small state in southern India, has moderately good health
care facilities and a high rate of tuberculosis. With a view to study
IS6110 polymorphism, we screened 80 isolates obtained from
patients at local tuberculosis clinics. The strains were isolated from
sputum samples on L-J medium, acid-fast stained, and confirmed to be
M. tuberculosis by standard biochemical tests. The DNA was
isolated by the sand procedure (5) and further purified by
phenol-chloroform extractions. The RFLP analysis was performed as
described earlier (8) using the
[
-32P]dCTP-labeled, amplified 245-bp fragment of
IS6110. The strains showing an absence of IS6110
in the RFLP assay were confirmed to be IS6110 negative by
PCR amplification of purified genomic DNA.
Among the 80 isolates, 19 had no copy of IS6110 and another
31 had only a single copy of the IS6110 sequence. All the
single-copy isolates (except three) showed a band at the 1.3-kb
position where an integration hot spot (ipl) has been
reported earlier (4). Thus, 50 (62.5%) of the 80 strains
were not typeable by IS6110-based fingerprinting. In
addition to this, another eight isolates had only 2 to 5 copies, making
definitive fingerprinting difficult. This study clearly shows that
IS6110-based fingerprinting is not possible in Kerala. While
small numbers of IS6110-deficient strains have been reported
earlier (ranging from less than 1% in San Francisco [1]
and 2% in Vietnam [6] to 4% in Chennai
[3]), this study is the first of its kind to report a
large number of IS6110-deficient strains while also
demonstrating unequivocally the inability to use the only approved and
accepted fingerprinting system for molecular epidemiology of
tuberculosis at least in some areas where tuberculosis is endemic.
The ramifications of the study are manifold. There is a clear need for
a usable fingerprinting system for areas where
IS6110-deficient strains abound. While several typing
systems such as polymorphic GC-rich sequence typing, variable number of
tandem repeat typing, and spoligotyping (7) have been
reported, none has the versatility or utility to replace
IS6110-based fingerprinting nor have they been widely used
in any area of endemicity. The second point is that most molecular
epidemiology studies of M. tuberculosis have been done
mainly in the developed world, where the extent and type of variants
are likely to be limited, unlike in an area where the disease is
endemic. This also raises the fundamental question of whether the
strain variations are restricted to IS6110 distribution or
the genetic differences are deeper. Thus, this modest study indicates a
need to carry out systematic molecular epidemiological screenings in
areas of endemicity to learn more about this pathogen.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology is under the Science,
Technology and Environment Department of the Government of Kerala and
is a recipient of program mode support from the Department of
Biotechnology, Government of India.
The technical assistance of Laiza K. Paul is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Phone: 91-471-345 899 Fax: 91-471-329 472 E-mail: mundayoor_s{at}yahoo.com
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Agasino, C. B.,
A. Ponce de Leon,
R. M. Jasmer, and P. M. Small.
1998.
Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that do not contain IS6110.
Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.
2:518-520[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bifani, P. J.,
B. B. Plikaytis,
V. Kapur,
K. Stockbauer,
X. Pan,
M. L. Lutley,
S. L. Moghazeh,
W. Eisner,
T. M. Daniel,
M. H. Kaplan,
J. T. Crawford,
J. M. Musser, and B. N. Kreisworth.
1996.
Origin and interstate spread of a New York City multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clone family.
JAMA
275:452-457[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Das, S.,
C. N. Paramasivan,
D. B. Lowrie,
R. Prabhakar, and P. R. Narayanan.
1995.
IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Madras, South India.
Tuber. Lung Dis.
76:550-554[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Fang, Z., and K. J. Forbes.
1997.
A Mycobacterium tuberculosis IS6110 preferential locus for insertion into the genome.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:479-481[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Kumar, R. A.,
I. Radhakrishnan, and S. Mundayoor.
2000.
A single-step, ecofriendly method to extract DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis for polymerase chain reaction.
Anal. Biochem.
286:310-312[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Park, Y. K.,
G. H. Bai, and S. J. Kim.
2000.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from countries in the Western Pacific Region.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:191-197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Saunders, N. A.
1999.
Review article: strain typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J. Infect.
18:80-86.
|
| 8.
|
van Embden, J. D. A.,
M. D. Cave,
J. T. Crawford,
J. W. Dale,
K. D. Eisenach,
B. Giquel,
P. W. M. Hermans,
C. Martin,
R. McAdam,
T. Shinnick, and P. M. Small.
1993.
Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standard methodology.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:406-409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| | | | |
Indulakshmi Radhakrishnan
Manju Y. K.
R. Ajay Kumar
Sathish Mundayoor*
Mycobacterial Research Group Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology Jagathy Trivandrum 695 014 Kerala, India
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2001, p. 1683-1683, Vol. 39, No. 4
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1683.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Haldar, S., Chakravorty, S., Bhalla, M., De Majumdar, S., Tyagi, J. S.
(2007). Simplified detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum using smear microscopy and PCR with molecular beacons. J Med Microbiol
56: 1356-1362
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quan, C., Lu, C.-Z., Qiao, J., Xiao, B.-G., Li, X.
(2006). Comparative evaluation of early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by different assays.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 3160-3166
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Balamurugan, R., Venkataraman, S., John, K. R., Ramakrishna, B. S.
(2006). PCR Amplification of the IS6110 Insertion Element of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Fecal Samples from Patients with Intestinal Tuberculosis.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 1884-1886
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Banu, S., Gordon, S. V., Palmer, S., Islam, R., Ahmed, S., Alam, K. M., Cole, S. T., Brosch, R.
(2004). Genotypic Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Bangladesh and Prevalence of the Beijing Strain. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 674-682
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mistry, N. F., Iyer, A. M., D'souza, D. T. B., Taylor, G. M., Young, D. B., Antia, N. H.
(2002). Spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Multiple-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients from Bombay, India. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2677-2680
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brosch, R., Gordon, S. V., Marmiesse, M., Brodin, P., Buchrieser, C., Eiglmeier, K., Garnier, T., Gutierrez, C., Hewinson, G., Kremer, K., Parsons, L. M., Pym, A. S., Samper, S., van Soolingen, D., Cole, S. T.
(2002). A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 3684-3689
[Abstract]
[Full Text]