JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 4 November 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kok, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, D. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kok, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, D. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.01465-09
Copyright (c) 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of a Rapid Antigen Test with Nucleic Acid Testing During Co-circulation of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 2009 and Seasonal Influenza A/H3N2

Jen Kok*, Christopher C. Blyth, Hong Foo, Jason Patterson, Janette Taylor, Kenneth McPhie, V. Mala Ratnamohan, Jonathan R. Iredell, and Dominic E. Dwyer

Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: jen.kok{at}swahs.health.nsw.gov.au.


arrow
Abstract

The rapid diagnosis of influenza is critical in optimizing clinical management. Rapid antigen tests have decreased sensitivity in detecting pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 when compared to seasonal influenza A subtypes (53.4% vs. 74.2%, p<0.001). Nucleic acid tests should be used to detect pandemic influenza when rapid antigen tests are negative.