JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 7 May 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.00714-08v1
46/7/2374    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Adelson, M. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Adelson, M. E.
J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.00714-08
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of respiratory virus detection rates in infants and toddlers using flocked swabs, saline aspirates and saline aspirates mixed in UTM-RT

Paul Walsh, Christina Lim Overmyer, Keimanh Pham, Scott Michealson, Larisa Gofman, Lisa DeSalvia, Ty Tran, Diana Gonzalez, James Pusavat, Melanie Feola, Kathryn T. Iacono, Eli Mordechai, and Martin E. Adelson

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, CA and Department of Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, CA; Research and Development Department, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C., Hamilton, NJ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield, CA


  Abstract

A nylon flocked swab/universal transport medium collection method developed for bacterial sexually transmitted infections was adapted to detect respiratory viruses in infants and toddlers. This method significantly out-performed traditionally used nasal aspirates in terms of PCR-based virus detection, (p=0.016), and was easier for clinicians to use, store and transport.




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.