This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schechner, V.
Right arrow Articles by Navon-Venezia, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schechner, V.
Right arrow Articles by Navon-Venezia, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009, p. 3261-3265, Vol. 47, No. 10
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02368-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of PCR-Based Testing for Surveillance of KPC-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Members of the Enterobacteriaceae Family{triangledown}

Vered Schechner,1 Keren Straus-Robinson,2 David Schwartz,3 Iris Pfeffer,1 Jalal Tarabeia,1 Rina Moskovich,1 Inna Chmelnitsky,2 Mitchell J. Schwaber,1 Yehuda Carmeli,1 and Shiri Navon-Venezia2*

Division of Epidemiology,1 Laboratory for Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Research,2 Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel3

Received 10 December 2008/ Returned for modification 13 February 2009/ Accepted 5 August 2009

The spread of carbapenem-resistant members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (CRE) harboring carbapenemases is an emerging public health threat. As KPC-producing Klebsiella species are endemic in our tertiary care hospital, we aimed to evaluate a PCR-based surveillance test for identification of rectal carriage of KPC-producing CRE. We conducted a surveillance study between May and December 2007. Rectal swabs were collected from patients known to harbor CRE and from contacts of newly discovered patients harboring CRE. Specimens were evaluated by culture and by PCR analysis for blaKPC and were defined as positive if CRE was cultured and blaKPC was identified. Discrepant results between the culture and PCR analysis were resolved by subculturing, repeating the PCR, and performing a hydrolysis assay. Positive CRE cultures prior or subsequent to the time of sampling for the study were also taken into consideration. Sensitivity, specificity, and time to result were calculated. A total of 755 swabs were included. Concordant results were documented for 735 specimens; 51 were positive as determined by both PCR and culture. Discrepancies existed for 20 swabs; 9 were blaKPC negative and CRE culture positive, and 11 were blaKPC positive and CRE culture negative. After repeat testing, a total of 64 samples were classified as blaKPC-positive CRE. The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR analysis were 92.2% and 99.6%, respectively, and those of the culture were 87.5% and 99.4%, respectively. Over the last 3 months of the study, the sensitivity of the PCR improved to 96.3%, versus 77.8% for culture. Time to result was 30 h for the PCR and 60 h (negative) and 75 h (positive) for the CRE culture. blaKPC PCR-based testing is a useful method for the surveillance of KPC-producing CRE. Its main advantage over culturing is a shorter time to result, and it may prove to be more sensitive.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Division of Epidemiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St., Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel. Phone: 972-3-6925644. Fax: 972-3-6974332. E-mail: shiri_nv{at}tasmc.health.gov.il

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 12 August 2009.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009, p. 3261-3265, Vol. 47, No. 10
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02368-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lolans, K., Calvert, K., Won, S., Clark, J., Hayden, M. K. (2010). Direct Ertapenem Disk Screening Method for Identification of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in Surveillance Swab Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 836-841 [Abstract] [Full Text]